It is a well known and heavily publicized fact that carbon monoxide is a dangerous gas even at low exposure

levels. While measurement solutions for residential applications are fairly simple, industrial and commercial

applications require a much more sophisticated instrument. Problems with the accuracy of many measurement

devices arise due to zero instability and cross sensitivity to other gasses on the sensors especially in industrial

situations where temperature changes and the presence of other process gasses are an ongoing part of everyday

life.

Upper exposure limits for CO in the work place are normally set to provide alarms or warnings at 25-50ppm,

sensor inaccuracies often cause alarms to be triggered when in fact no actual carbon monoxide danger exists.

When higher levels of CO are present, proper safety procedure calls for the halt of production and the

evacuation of all personnel from the area until the levels can be verified, reduced and the source

identified. These precautions taken against this potentially deadly gas show responsibility on the part of the

employer and can save the lives of many who work to make the company profitable. The resulting down time can

however have many detrimental effects including, employee stress, safety concerns from outside agencies, and

reduced production, it is therefore vitally important that we ensure that CO alarms are set off only by actual

increased levels of carbon monoxide. In an effort to reach this goal there are a number of considerations to be

looked at, the following information is provided for that purpose.

The most common types of detectors used for Carbon Monoxide measurements are,

1) NDIR or infra-red which although is very specific to the gas being measured requires a warm-up time, is fairly

large, can consume larger amounts of power making it unsuitable for small or portable instruments, and is more

expensive. For ranges of CO measurement in industrial uses other than Low ppm this technology is by far the

number one choice.

2) Solid State, while this technology is small and cost effective it is not selective enough for CO only

measurements and usually has higher temperature drift making the zero unstable.

3) and Electrochemical which is the primary choice for the majority of Carbon Monoxide analyzers on the market

today due to it’s many benefits which include, size, weight, power, cost, and proven performance.

The remainder of this article will deal only with the electrochemical sensor.

There are a number of electrochemical sensor manufacturers worldwide and each of these has a number of

sensors designed for carbon monoxide measurements in different applications, choosing the right one is the key to

success. The output from most of these sensors is very low, (pico amps per parts per million) so even subtle

changes or correction procedures must be dealt with using extreme care in order to preserve the integrity of the

signal.

Sensors designed for higher concentrations of CO have a lower output per ppm which can cause it to have a

higher temperature coefficient, this leads to zero instability making it unsuitable for our task.

Carbon and chemical filters are often attached to the face of the sensor or added in the sample stream to diminish

the effects of cross interference to many of the commonly encountered such as H2S, SO2, NO x, etc..

This filter, it’s efficiency and life span can be an important consideration when measuring CO in the 0-50ppm

range.

In a number of applications background levels of Hydrogen given off by nearby processes have been found to

cause major problems with accurate low level carbon monoxide measurements and alarms. While it is possible

for hydrogen levels to cause safety concerns that should be reported, the limit is magnitudes higher than what

causes the CO alarms to trigger on most instruments. A hydrogen level of as little as 60ppm can trip the CO

alarms of many analyzers. The lower explosive limit (lel)for hydrogen is 4%, ten percent of that l.e.l. would be

4000ppm, so we see that the 60ppm is insignificant to personnel safety but remains problematic to the carbon

monoxide measurement. This cross interference can not be easily overcome with chemical filters and therefore

required a different approach. It has been found that by measuring the hydrogen separately and using that signal

in conjunction with the mixed CO/H2 signal the majority of the interference can be nulled out, again manufactures

deal with this differently with varying results. The use of two separate sensors can create a compensation lag

time and there may be temperature coefficient differences between the sensors, either of which will cause errors

in the readings and provide false alarms. Similar temperature problems can be found with units that use a single

sensor but do the electronic nulling and temperature compensation remote of the sensor itself.

There are sensors now available that have separate electrodes for the H2 and CO/H2 signals with the nulling and

temperature compensation circuit attached directly to the rear of the sensor itself. The output of this surface

mount board is in the millivolt range making it less susceptible to interference and change from wiring,

connectors and temperature effects. Each sensor and attached PCB come completely pre-calibrated for H2 cross

interference and relative CO output. Only a single calibration gas is required over the life of the sensor (2 years)

with no need for re calibration of the hydrogen signal nulling found in any of the units put into service. In

addition, the internal chemical filter provides excellent reduction of cross interference due to other common

gasses found. This customer replaceable sensor has proven itself over time to provide consistently accurate

results in demanding applications against competitors instruments.

Dover Gas Technologies Inc. www.dovergas.com incorporates such a sensor, we believe it best suits the needs

addressed above and use it in many of our portable, transmitter, and monitor products for low level ppm CO

measurement.

President and operations manager of Dover Gas since 1991 with 8 years of prior experience in the gas analysis field.